| Year | Tournament | Result | Player | Age | Nation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 | Australian Open | R128 | Novak Djokovic | 18 | Serbia |
| 2005 | US Open | R32 | Novak Djokovic | 18 | Serbia |
| 2005 | US Open | R32 | Jelena Janković | 20 | Serbia |
| 2005 | US Open | R64 | Ana Ivanovic | 17 | Serbia |
| 2005 | US Open | R128 | Janko Tipsarević | 21 | Serbia |
| 2005 | Wimbledon | R32 | Janko Tipsarević | 20 | Serbia |
| 2005 | Wimbledon | R32 | Novak Djokovic | 18 | Serbia |
| 2005 | Wimbledon | R32 | Ana Ivanovic | 17 | Serbia |
| 2005 | Wimbledon | R32 | Jelena Janković | 20 | Serbia |
| 2005 | French Open | Q | Ana Ivanovic | 17 | Serbia |
| 2005 | French Open | R64 | Janko Tipsarević | 20 | Serbia |
| 2005 | French Open | R64 | Novak Djokovic | 18 | Serbia |
| 2005 | French Open | R128 | Jelena Janković | 20 | Serbia |
| 2005 | Australian Open | R32 | Ana Ivanovic | 17 | Serbia |
| 2005 | Australian Open | R64 | Janko Tipsarević | 20 | Serbia |
| 2005 | Australian Open | R64 | Jelena Janković | 19 | Serbia |
| 2005 | Australian Open | R128 | Novak Djokovic | 17 | Serbia |
| 2004 | US Open | R64 | Jelena Janković | 19 | Serbia |
| 2004 | US Open | R128 | Janko Tipsarević | 20 | Serbia |
| 2004 | Wimbledon | R128 | Janko Tipsarević | 19? | Serbia |
| 2004 | Wimbledon | R128 | Jelena Janković | 19 | Serbia |
| 2004 | French Open | R128 | Janko Tipsarević | 19 | Serbia |
| 2004 | French Open | R128 | Jelena Janković | 19 | Serbia |
| 2004 | Australian Open | R64 | Jelena Janković | 18 | Serbia |
| 2003 | US Open | R128 | Janko Tipsarević | 19 | Serbia |
| 2003 | Australian Open | R64 | Jelena Janković | 17 | Serbia |
| 2001 | Australian Open | R128 | Nenad Zimonjić | 24 | Serbia |
| 1999 | Wimbledon | R32 | Nenad Zimonjić | 23 | Serbia |
Open Era Grand Slam Tennis
This site is dedicated to Grand Slam tennis stats from the Open Era – for those of us who love the numbers behind the game. Pick any group of players and see how they rank. Compare, filter, and view the same data from different angles – whether you want to explore dominance, consistency, or longevity. In short: It’s all about turning tennis history into insights you can actually play with.